Skratch Labs
Facts-only compliance record. Every entry is source-backed and dated.
Event Timeline
No published COAs or top-tier certifications
No published Certificates of Analysis or top-tier certifications (NSF, USP, Informed Sport, Clean Label Project, ConsumerLab) identified as of April 2026.
Prop 65 consent judgment for lead and mercury
Consent judgment (case 2023-01275) with ERC for failure to warn about lead and mercury exposure. $10,000 settlement ($7,500 to OEHHA, $2,500 to ERC). Sets a daily mercury exposure limit of 0.3 micrograms. Original 60-day notice filed 2022 (case 2022-00984).
Manufacturer Q&A
We asked Skratch five questions about sourcing, manufacturing and testing. Answers appear here in the brand's own words, and only when we hold a dated screenshot of the reply. Unanswered questions stay visibly unanswered — we do not fill them with our own research.
Questions sent September 21, 2026. No reply on record.
Q1 · Sodium source
What is the sodium source used in this product (e.g. sodium chloride, sodium citrate, sea salt — specify grade/supplier type if you disclose it)?
No response yet — Requested 2026-09-21.
Q2 · Mineral sourcing process
Describe your sourcing process for sodium and other minerals (how suppliers are selected/qualified).
No response yet — Requested 2026-09-21.
Q3 · Country of manufacture
Country of manufacture for the finished product (or primary manufacturing site)?
No response yet — Requested 2026-09-21.
Q4 · Country of mixing / packaging
Country of mixing / packaging, if different from manufacture?
No response yet — Requested 2026-09-21.
Q5 · Third-party testing
What third-party testing do you claim (labs, analytes, frequency)? Link or attach a current COA policy if public.
No response yet — Requested 2026-09-21.
“Verified reply” means we have a dated screenshot of the brand stating this. It is not a score, a rating, or an endorsement, and a brand's silence here is not itself a finding.